Consideration

Consideration: If BOLT 1 continues to be offered on a voluntary basis, and if 15 people take each iteration, and if participation in BOLT 2 can only be authorized by Deans/Chairs, with the prerequisite that faculty participate in BOLT 1, then this... More

Consideration: If BOLT 1 continues to be offered on a voluntary basis, and if 15 people take each iteration, and if participation in BOLT 2 can only be authorized by Deans/Chairs, with the prerequisite that faculty participate in BOLT 1, then this significantly limits the participant pool of BOLT 2. The question becomes: is BOLT 2 sustainable? (assuming not everyone participating in BOLT 1 wants to participate in BOLT 2). Can additional offerings of BOLT 1 occur (e.g., 2 per term)? This would potentially increase the pool of candidates for BOLT 2. Can the requirements for taking BOLT 2 change? (e.g., faculty could take an online version of BOLT 1, thereby satisfying, albeit in an alternate format, the conditions). Can the structure and requirements of BOLT 1 be changed? (e.g., make the process of developing an online/blended course span 14 weeks (either during one term or spread out over 2 terms). Consideration: There is a lot of information on the BOLT 1 website. My first question rel Less