BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Pacific Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T California
(U 1001 C),
Complainant
v.
O1 Communications, Inc.
(U 6065 C),
Defendant
Case No.
____________
COMPLAINT OF PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE...
More
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Pacific Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T California
(U 1001 C),
Complainant
v.
O1 Communications, Inc.
(U 6065 C),
Defendant
Case No.
____________
COMPLAINT OF PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
D/B/A AT&T CALIFORNIA (U 1001 C)
Pursuant to California Public Utilities Code § 1702 and Article 4 of the Rules of
Practice and Procedure of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
(“Commission”), Pacific Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T California (U 1001 C)
(“AT&T California”) hereby avers and complains of O1 Communications, Inc.
(U 6065 C) as follows:
I.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
1.
Pursuant to the interconnection agreement between AT&T California and
O1 Communications, Inc.
, calls bound for an information service provider (“ISP-bound
traffic”) are not subject to reciprocal compensation; rather, such traffic is subject to the
rebuttable presumption pricing regime established by the Federal Communications
Co
Less
